Connect with us

About Us

Most people do not follow the news. They mean to. Then a week goes by, a Thursday night arrives, and they sit down wanting to know what actually happened while they were not looking.

That reader is who The Little Binger is for. The name is not a joke about television. It is a description of how our readers behave. They leave the news alone for days and then take the whole thing in one sitting, so we write every article for the version of you that has just come back after five days away.

How this site started

Between us we came out of wire copy, a regional news desk and a daily business email. One of us spent years writing the grey box at the top of other people’s running stories, the two hundred words under a heading like what you need to know that exist to get a latecomer to the point. That box is written last, usually by whoever is still at a desk near midnight, and it is very often the only part of the page a reader finishes.

The idea here was to stop treating that box as a courtesy and write it first. A rolling feed is a fine product for a reader who is already current. If you read Tuesday’s update, Wednesday’s update is exactly what you want. If you did not read Tuesday, you get a headline about a minister denying a second claim, with no minister, no first claim and no reason to keep reading. Live blogs are the same problem at full volume, written backwards for people holding down the refresh key.

The thing we got wrong first

Our first plan was one enormous weekly wrap, published on a Sunday. It seemed obvious. If readers binge, give them the binge. It did not work, for a reason that now sounds dull: nobody’s week breaks on schedule. People catch up when a gap opens, on a Tuesday evening or over a slow Friday lunch, and one vast Sunday file is its own homework assignment.

So we inverted it. Every single article on this site is built to be the first thing you have read about its subject. We also numbered our follow-ups for a while, part two, part three, on the theory that people would want the set. They do not want the set. They want the piece in front of them to work on its own, and the numbering was a polite way of admitting it did not.

The five-day test

A normal morning here starts by sorting overnight coverage into two piles: things that changed, and things that were merely said again. The second pile is most of it. What survives gets commissioned against one question, which is what a reader who last looked on Friday needs in order to understand this by the end of the third paragraph.

Then the draft goes to an editor who has deliberately not read the source material. Their job is to mark every sentence they had to take on trust, such as an acronym nobody expanded, a committee that turns up with no explanation of what it does, or the phrase “the ruling” quietly doing the work of a whole clause. Every mark gets fixed or cut before publication. Our editorial standards set out the rest of how a story travels from a tip to a page.

What we cover

General news, sorted into Auto, Business, Entertainment, Gaming, Lifestyle, News, Science, Sports, Tech and Travel. The mix is deliberately broad because catch-up reading is broad. Somebody returning after a week away wants the election, the interest rate, the transfer, the console launch and the thing their brother-in-law keeps mentioning.

What we skip is the hourly increment. We are not trying to be first to tell you that a hearing has been scheduled. We would rather be the site that explains, once the hearing has happened, what it was about and what it changed.

Who runs the site

The Little Binger is independent. It is owned and run by its founding editorial team, with no parent company, no investor holding a seat at the story meeting, no political party and no state money behind it. The full ownership picture sits on its own page rather than buried in this one, because it should be easy to check: see ownership and funding.

The newsroom is small and the roles are real rather than decorative. A managing editor owns the daily list and the corrections queue. Section editors carry the beats and still write, which is the only way a small team keeps any expertise. A copy desk runs the cold reads and the last check on law and language. Named freelancers cover specialisms a small staff cannot honestly claim, and their work goes through the same test as everything else.

How we pay for it

Advertising, and nothing clever. The site is free, with no paywall, no metered limit and no wall asking you to register before you can read a paragraph. Display placements and newsletter sponsorship pay the wages. Where a commercial partner pays for an article, it is labelled as sponsored, it looks different from our journalism, and nobody in the newsroom writes it.

The firewall is a working arrangement rather than a sentence in a policy. The people who sell advertising do not attend the meeting where we decide what to cover, they do not see stories before publication, and an advertiser who asks for a preview or a pull is told no. Anyone buying space can read the rules they are agreeing to on our advertise page.

When we get it wrong

Writing for people with no context raises the cost of an error. A regular reader can spot a wrong figure because it contradicts what they read yesterday. Ours cannot, since yesterday is precisely what they missed, so the whole burden sits with us.

We check claims before publication rather than after, and we work to the IFCN principles on how that is done. When something is wrong we fix it on the page, say what was wrong and when we changed it, and we never quietly swap a word and move on. The mechanics are in our corrections policy and our fact-checking process.

What we will not do

We do not publish a three-sentence placeholder to hold a search position while we work out what happened. We turn down sponsored articles built to look like reported news, including the recurring monthly kind that would be genuinely useful to our accounts. We do not assemble gadget or travel round-ups backwards from an affiliate list. Nobody buys a mention here, at any price, and the request comes in often enough that we now answer it in one line.

We also do not serialise. If a story can be told once, properly, we tell it once, even though four instalments would perform better. That choice costs us money in a way we can measure, and we have made peace with it.

Talking to us

One inbox reaches this newsroom, read by editors: support@thelittlebinger.com. Tips, complaints, factual corrections, pitches and advertising questions all land there and get sorted by whoever is on the desk.

Corrections jump the queue. Tell us a fact is wrong and it goes to the managing editor the same day, and you will hear back even when the answer is that we have rechecked and we are standing by the line. What each kind of message needs from you is set out on our contact page.